At the Trevin Wax blog today I read the following, Hell was in turmoil:
Let no one lament persistent failings, for forgiveness has risen from the grave.
Let no one fear death, for the death of our Saviour has set us free.
The Lord has destroyed death by enduring it.
The Lord vanquished hell when he descended into it.
The Lord put hell in turmoil even as it tasted of his flesh.
Hell was in turmoil having been eclipsed.
Hell was in turmoil having been mocked.
Hell was in turmoil having been destroyed.
Hell was in turmoil having been abolished.
Hell was in turmoil having been made captive.
Hell grasped a corpse, and met God.
Hell seized earth, and encountered Heaven.
Hell took what it saw, and was overcome by what it could not see.
O Death, where is your sting?
O Hell, where is your victory?
Christ is risen, and you are cast down!
Christ is risen, and the tomb is emptied of its dead.
I think most of us are somewhat wary of unreferenced material of this nature, splendid and true though the statements are. A PG reference would be so much nicer!
But surely Chrysostom must have preached more than 2 sermons at Easter? In the CPG, vol. 2, p.573, I find a number of entries:
4605, Sermo catecheticus in pascha, PG 59, 721-724.
4606, In sanctum pascha sermo 1, PG 59, 723-726; followed by 6 more sermons of the same kind, all published by P. Nautin in Sources Chretiennes 36, SC27 and SC48.
Hmm. Let’s look these up. And we find … yes, the first item is the source.
It’s very short fragment of only a couple of pages, plainly mutilated. Both the Lavergne and Dobbs translations translate the whole of Migne’s text. It is placed by Migne, the PG editor, among the spuria, and the other sermons likewise.
Let’s see what Nautin has to say about these items.
In SC 36, he discusses sermones 1-3 (CPG 4606-8). All this material is transmitted under the name of Chrysostom. But both Henry Savile and Bernard Montfaucon rejected this authorship. And Nautin states that the 7 homilies are not by the same author. Homily 6 is attributed to a pseudo-Hippolytus; but there are several authors in the collection. He does feel that the works must date from the late 4th – early 5th century. Unfortunately he does not discuss our text.
- SC36, p.26.↩