<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A difficult piece of Greek in Eusebius</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=470</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Antiquity, Patristics, putting things online, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 07:51:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roger Pearse</title>
		<link>http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=470&#038;cpage=1#comment-2533</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Pearse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=470#comment-2533</guid>
		<description>Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Snapp, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=470&#038;cpage=1#comment-2532</link>
		<dc:creator>James Snapp, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=470#comment-2532</guid>
		<description>Different also is his word/saying to the women.

James Kelhoffer&#039;s work on &quot;Ad Marinum&quot; should be downloadable from his page at the St. Louis University website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different also is his word/saying to the women.</p>
<p>James Kelhoffer&#8217;s work on &#8220;Ad Marinum&#8221; should be downloadable from his page at the St. Louis University website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Pearse</title>
		<link>http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=470&#038;cpage=1#comment-2505</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Pearse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=470#comment-2505</guid>
		<description>No hassle!  So what does that make the text?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No hassle!  So what does that make the text?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=470&#038;cpage=1#comment-2503</link>
		<dc:creator>David Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=470#comment-2503</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments.

It wasn&#039;t till I got on to the next fragment that I found the answer:  &quot;aggeloi&quot; is a scribal error for &quot;logoi&quot;.   I should have looked further on before screaming for help!

Sorry to have taken your time.

            David Miller (translator)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t till I got on to the next fragment that I found the answer:  &#8220;aggeloi&#8221; is a scribal error for &#8220;logoi&#8221;.   I should have looked further on before screaming for help!</p>
<p>Sorry to have taken your time.</p>
<p>            David Miller (translator)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Sommer</title>
		<link>http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=470&#038;cpage=1#comment-2496</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Sommer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=470#comment-2496</guid>
		<description>I agree that, absent scribal error, the only intelligent reading of the passage is that Eusebius thought there were two angels.  Perhpas he was thinking of Luke&#039;s version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that, absent scribal error, the only intelligent reading of the passage is that Eusebius thought there were two angels.  Perhpas he was thinking of Luke&#8217;s version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikokki</title>
		<link>http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=470&#038;cpage=1#comment-2495</link>
		<dc:creator>ikokki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 12:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.roger-pearse.com/weblog/?p=470#comment-2495</guid>
		<description>Indeed Eusebius says that Matthew talks about 2 angels. On lines 4 and 5 he says that [Mary] Magdalen saw 2 angels sitting outside the grave, and one did this and the other did that ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed Eusebius says that Matthew talks about 2 angels. On lines 4 and 5 he says that [Mary] Magdalen saw 2 angels sitting outside the grave, and one did this and the other did that &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
