Difference between revisions of "Notes on Syriac Grammar"

From Encyclopedia of Syriac Literature
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
= Notes on Syriac Grammar =
 
= Notes on Syriac Grammar =
  
Much simpler than Latin.  Add more when I learn more.
+
Syriac grammar seems to be rather simpler than for Latin.  (Add more when I learn more).  These notes merely reflect some casual reading in the grammars.  I have found that you need at least three, since all of them drop into gibberish on one point or another; but the real answer may be found in one of the others.
  
 
== Nouns ==
 
== Nouns ==

Revision as of 20:51, 3 April 2006

Notes on Syriac Grammar

Syriac grammar seems to be rather simpler than for Latin. (Add more when I learn more). These notes merely reflect some casual reading in the grammars. I have found that you need at least three, since all of them drop into gibberish on one point or another; but the real answer may be found in one of the others.

Nouns

Nouns do not decline. They change by number (singular and plural), gender (masculine or feminine), and 'state' (emphatic, absolute, and construct).

Number and gender are as in Latin.

'State' is peculiar to Aramaic. 'Emphatic' has no connection with emphasis. No idea what emphatic and absolute indicate otherwise. (Perhaps we translate them both the same?) Construct is used like a genetive, when one noun in construct precedes another in emphatic (like romanorum imperator - GEN+NOM). But genetive is normally handled by a specific symbol (in serto in green book).

(How do they do direct object/indirect object?)

Verbs

The terminology applied to bits of verbs in Syriac uses the same words found in Latin, and applies them to different things. (One can only presume that some early Syriacologist was dropped on the head as a child).

Tenses are the same idea as in Latin, but named funny, and only a few of them.

Voices in Syriac (active, passive, etc) are called 'conjugations' (what a stupid, stupid idea). They're different to those in Latin and English.

The type of verb (which would be called a conjugation in Latin) has no name, but is named after various example verbs.

Tenses

Verbs have only perfect tense and imperfect tense, plus a rash of participles and infinitives.

'perfect' tense = actually any 'past' tense.
'imperfect' tense = actually a 'future' tense. (Which drongo thought that one up?)

If you need to say something in the present tense, use a participle. (how?)

'Conjugations' (=voices)

What the grammar calls a 'conjugation' is actually a voice. There are 6 of them, including the active and passive. (list them: stuff on ethpeal, etc, and REAL transcription of them)

Types of verb (which would be called conjugations in Latin)

...several of these, strong and weak ...