I’ve been blogging about the arrest (twice) of preacher Josh Williamson in Perth, Scotland. He said that he was arrested and was taken to a police station, where he was refused a solicitor. The police have denied that he was arrested. He was arrested again last Saturday. The circumstances of all this seem very unclear, and the police seem disinclined to clarify matters, which raises the worst suspicions.
Today I learn that the Spectator has run an article by Rod Liddle, Josh Williamson is arrested for preaching the Christian gospel in public.
Freedom of speech is alive and well in Scotland, then. Pastor Josh Williamson took the Christian gospel to the streets of Perth last week, before he was arrested by the old bill for a ‘breach of the peace’. Asked why he was being arrested, Plod No 1 said because you’re too loud, pointing to the electrical device the clergyman was carrying. That’s an MP3 recorder, he replied, it’s not an amplifier. Then Plod No 2 claimed it was the content of his sermon, although he could not put his finger on what it was exactly. Hauled down the nick, refused the right of a lawyer, Williamson was eventually released with a verbal caution and the comment from another copper: ‘You seem like a reasonable man, why not just stop preaching?’
I wonder if that would have worked with Christ? The cops also arrested a man who had been enjoying the sermon, for asserting that he had been enjoying the sermon. They have since denied Williamson was arrested at all — but this is a lie, because the pastor recorded the copper saying ‘I am arresting you’, and I’ve heard it.
This all sounds very bad. But we’re not getting the full story here, I sense. Why are the police doing this? This is what makes no sense to me.
People like Josh Williamson have stood in the streets, preaching the gospel (to a handful of supporters, in the main) for at least 50 years. What is the new urgency that means that the police now need to harass them?
Some may wonder why this blog, which is mainly focused on patristics, is devoting space to this issue. But it seems rather difficult to focus on the confessors and the martyrs of the past, when I read that new ones are being created on the streets of Britain and the USA right now.
Oh for happier days, when such things were unheard of in a free country.
Update: While looking for an illustration, I happened across this 2012 article about another preacher being arrested (and acquitted) in Inverness:
Clutching his bible and carrying his placard, the former bricklayer is not only a visible feature but very much an audible presence — although his direct approach is not always appreciated by shoppers and passers-by, as he recently discovered.
For the 66-year-old recently found himself in the dock at Inverness Sheriff Court, accused of making offensive remarks and warning people they would “burn in hell” if they did not turn to God.
Having denied the charges, Mr MacDonald, of Lochiel Road, Hilton, was subsequently acquitted of behaving in a threatening and abusive manner.
Does modern Scotland, founded by the fiery preacher John Knox, really have no place in it for a man like this?
UPDATE: 25th September. The Perth Courier has a follow-up story on the man who queried the “arrest that wasn’t an arrest” (according to the police):
Joe McLoughlin, 43, stepped in when police ordered Mr Williamson to stop his sermon because he was “too loud”.
The pair were driven to Perth police station where officers attempted to issue Mr McLoughlin with a £40 fixed penalty notice. But the Letham resident, a full-time carer for his elderly mother, refused to sign the paperwork and plans to take legal action against Police Scotland.
He said: “I did not accept. I refused this ticket. I don’t feel like I was properly charged with anything. They talked about breach of the peace, obstructing justice and section 13 of the public order act. They’ve left me in confusion. I don’t know what I was arrested for.
“I’ve made a statement and it’s in the hands of my solicitors.”
Mr McLoughlin claims officers were heavy-handed when he refused to stop speaking up for the clergyman. He said: “One of them put my hand up my back and frogmarched me to a van. He told me now I am being arrested for ‘making a fool of myself in the f*****g High Street’.”
A police spokesman said: “We can confirm that a 43-year-old man was arrested and subsequently issued with a fixed penalty notice following an incident in Perth High Street on September 18.”
Despite his ordeal, Mr McLoughlin was back in the High Street yesterday, bible in hand, preaching to passing shoppers.
He said: “It’s 10 years since I did this and you could say I was inspired by Josh. The thought behind it is, if we don’t use this right we’ll lose it.
“My granddad fought for the right to have freedom of speech and what the police did insults everyone who fought for that freedom. That’s really what is at stake here. I was scared by the police response to Josh. I feel like he was exercising his right to freedom of speech and I was defending his right to freedom of speech.
“It’s given me an incentive to go back out on to the streets and I got quite a positive reaction. A couple of people stopped and spoke to me.”
This is all very bad. It is horrible to see this level of police incompetence and unprofessionalism, all of it merely to harass some harmless street preachers.
UPDATE: The story now appears in the Daily Express, and the Scotsman.
13 thoughts on “More on the “arrest” of Josh Williamson”
« Why are the police doing this? » : Are you serious, Mr Pearse ? you know already very well the answer : Because of the Homosexualist lobby.
Here in France we have the same issues with what is called « The (absolute) Lobby ».
Well, but that’s the thing: there’s no indication that this is the case here. If Josh Williamson had dared to say that unnatural vice is a sin, thereby offending that ever-militant lobby, then the police would have been obliged to treat him with special severity, and to charge him with “hate”, which attracts far heavier penalties. In Britain favoured groups have a special legal status, and this is represented in police computer systems. Any offence against a member of one of those groups is treated far more seriously than against you or I; and special penalties apply (what happened to “equal before the law”?). None of this seems to be coming into play here.
I was going to comment that “he last 50 years” is an especially conservative time scale. Your mention of Knox corrects this, making it at least several hundred years.
At least we can’t complain that we weren’t warned about such times.
The reason for specifying 50 years is that I remember that period myself!
Ah, well then, may I point out that you are of “an especially conservative timescale”. 🙂
Reposted on Facebook with this comment:
Another preacher arrested for saying something someone doesn’t like.
The question is, how does “free speech” interact with the interests of specific groups who don’t like particular things being said?
I would have supposed that there would be no need to talk of “free speech”, except explicitly as a principle under which to judge situations in which someone takes umbrage.
Sadly single-issue pressure groups have acquired so much power that the constitution counts for nothing.
That’s because voters who complain about their lost freedom of thinking and speaking vote for politicians who are on all fours in front of these lobbies, these terrorists, as we do also in France.
I think that the Lobby has numerous picts of politicians on all fours in some “parties”.
We have to use our vote wisely. Such as it is.
I think all religion is stupid and those in the street preaching are daft. My opinion
But in a free country, just as I am allowed to think and say those things, so should these guys be allowed to say their things.
I hope the police woman in question gets a right verbal thrashing for this. The police are way out of order
That’s a sane point of view. NB this is an old post. Sadly further incidents followed.
You will be interested to know , that Pastor Williamson , is now being harassed and arrested in South East Queensland